<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minor Thoughts &#187; Health care vs health insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minorthoughts.com/economics/health-care-vs-health-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minorthoughts.com</link>
	<description>In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 03:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Health care vs health insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.minorthoughts.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fminorthoughts.com%2Feconomics%2Fhealth-care-vs-health-insurance%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=Health+care+vs+health+insurance</link>
		<comments>http://www.minorthoughts.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fminorthoughts.desertflood.com%2Feconomics%2Fhealth-care-vs-health-insurance%2F%23comment-&#038;seed_title=Health+care+vs+health+insurance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minorthoughts.com/?p=1189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Russ Roberts reminds me about the <a href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/08/health-care-vs-health-insurance.html">difference between health care and health insurance</a> &#8212; especially as it pertains to the elderly.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>It&#8217;s the wrong question because when you&#8217;re 65 the problem isn&#8217;t getting insurance. It&#8217;s paying for health care. But the public debate has become so obsessed with health care insurance we&#8217;ve forgotten what the real issues are.</p>
  
  <p>When you turn 65, the high cost of insurance isn&#8217;t the problem. The problem is that you&#8217;re old. A lot more things are going to go wrong. Yes insurance is going to be costly. But that&#8217;s because so many things are more likely to break in your body. The high cost of insurance at that point is just a result of the problem. It&#8217;s not the problem itself.</p>
  
  <p>It&#8217;s like saying that if you drive your car in a demolition derby, it&#8217;s hard to get coverage for collision damage. No kidding.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>What&#8217;s needed isn&#8217;t more insurance for the elderly but more savings. Providing savings through insurance is just a way to disguise what&#8217;s really going on. It&#8217;s not insurance, it&#8217;s a subsidy for the savings that weren&#8217;t done before or it&#8217;s a wealth transfer from people with high incomes to people with low savings.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ Roberts reminds me about the <a href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/08/health-care-vs-health-insurance.html">difference between health care and health insurance</a> &#8212; especially as it pertains to the elderly.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>It&#8217;s the wrong question because when you&#8217;re 65 the problem isn&#8217;t getting insurance. It&#8217;s paying for health care. But the public debate has become so obsessed with health care insurance we&#8217;ve forgotten what the real issues are.</p>
  
  <p>When you turn 65, the high cost of insurance isn&#8217;t the problem. The problem is that you&#8217;re old. A lot more things are going to go wrong. Yes insurance is going to be costly. But that&#8217;s because so many things are more likely to break in your body. The high cost of insurance at that point is just a result of the problem. It&#8217;s not the problem itself.</p>
  
  <p>It&#8217;s like saying that if you drive your car in a demolition derby, it&#8217;s hard to get coverage for collision damage. No kidding.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>What&#8217;s needed isn&#8217;t more insurance for the elderly but more savings. Providing savings through insurance is just a way to disguise what&#8217;s really going on. It&#8217;s not insurance, it&#8217;s a subsidy for the savings that weren&#8217;t done before or it&#8217;s a wealth transfer from people with high incomes to people with low savings.</p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minorthoughts.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fminorthoughts.desertflood.com%2Feconomics%2Fhealth-care-vs-health-insurance%2F%23comment-&#038;seed_title=Health+care+vs+health+insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

