Silly Unions, Act 10 Doesn't Violate Civil Rights
At the time, I thought that their case was exceedingly weak and more in the vein of a stupid Hail Mary attempt than a serious effort at practicing law. Today, I saw that the United States Court for the Western District of Wisconsin appears to agree with me. They denied the unions' request for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injuction in quite plain terms. Check out the ruling [PDF].
If you don't read the ruling, the breakdown of their argument shows you pretty clearly what they think. It’s not a final ruling yet but, if this is representative of what the court is thinking, the final ruling could be even more fun.
- “There Is A Rational Basis For The Differing Treatment Of General Employees And Public Safety Employees”
- “Plaintiffs’ Attempt To Reduce Act 10 To Crass Political Payback Fail”
- “Plaintiffs Have No Probability Of Success On The Merits Of Their First Amendment Claim, As That Claim Is Without Merit”
- “Plaintiffs Misstate The Nature Of Their Alleged Irreparable Harm”
- “The State And The Public Interest Will Suffer Great Irreparable Harm By The Issuance Of A Preliminary Injunction”
- “Plaintiffs Seek To Alter The Status Quo, Not Maintain It, By Asking For A Remedy That Will Result In A Completely New Set Of Collective Bargaining Statute”
The ruling is all kinds of good fun.